
Happy New Year! (Or it was when I began thinking about this post…even if I did finish it just today)
Like the rest of the world, I too tend to “wake up” at the first of the year and try to go from 0 to 60 at the chime of midnight.
Like the rest of the world I’ll spend the next few weeks diligently trying to loose weight, learn a language, write a book, travel, blog more, enjoy family and jump out of an airplane – all at the same time. Ok, maybe not jump out of a plane.
But why do we do it? Begin every year with a, sometimes overwhelming, list?
I was wondering that this week as I blatantly avoided my gym due to it being packed to the gills with new-year’s-resolutioners. And yes, I’m aware that I too can be given that appellation – I am not a regular at my gym, no matter how much I may wish it otherwise.
I think it really may come down to nomenclature. New Year. In my head it is all about starting fresh. A new year, a new me. Tabula Rasa. The old me, the one who didn’t quite get things right, who gained 20lbs, who didn’t travel or read enough is gone. Now I can be a new me, a better me and the resolutions are just reminders of what the new me should look like.
What is interesting is that I had a discussion with a colleague whose take was fundamentally different. She saw the new year as an opportunity to learn from past mistakes. That each year builds on itself. While we talked about this it reminded me of a philosophical argument from years ago about how we look at laws and makes a very interesting parallel.
What I’m talking about is the infamous Dred Scott court decision (Dred Scott v. Sandford). What happened was that Dred Scott, a Virginia man born into slavery who sued for his freedom. While owned by a military officer, Scott travelled through and resided in Illinois and Wisconsin, both free states. He appealed to the court system that as he had been in those free territories, then he should, by rights, be free. The judge ruled “no” and Dred Scott was sent back to his master as property. A few years later, the 14th Amendment passed and courts began ruling the other way.
So here’s the question (and how it relates to my musing) was the Dred Scott decision wrong and the later courts got it right? Meaning, as my colleague promotes – are we are always moving ahead, learning, and therefore getting closer to some unforeseeable objective “better?” Or, is it like my view of the New Year – the “better” not really objective at all, but merely a reflection of our times and/or a reaction to where we are individually in our lives? As in, the Dred Scott decision was a reflection of our times and when times changed so did the court rulings. And, God-forbid, if slavery ever returned (and some would state variants still exist) that we would again decisions like the Dred Scott case.
When put in context of the legal case, my knee-jerk response is to lean towards philosophical optimism and agree with my colleague – we are in a state of constant improvement. And yet, I am loathe to let go of the artifice of starting fresh every January 1.
So…thinking about this, where do you find yourself in this new year?





